Re: ERROR: posting list tuple with 20 items cannot be split at offset 168

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Herman verschooten
Тема Re: ERROR: posting list tuple with 20 items cannot be split at offset 168
Дата
Msg-id 4F70DF51-FD72-41EC-9D7F-40C359AB3838@verschooten.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: ERROR: posting list tuple with 20 items cannot be split at offset 168  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: ERROR: posting list tuple with 20 items cannot be split at offset 168  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Hi Peter,

Thanks for the info.
I don’t recall the exact 13 version we were on.

I can confirm that after dropping and recreating the 6 indexes everything is working fine.

Thanks for all the help, both here and on slack,

Herman


> Op 25 okt. 2021, om 17:29 heeft Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> het volgende geschreven:
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 2:59 AM Herman verschooten
> <Herman@verschooten.net> wrote:
>> tranman_production=# update freights set cmr_received=false where id=49632;
>> ERROR:  XX000: posting list tuple with 20 items cannot be split at offset 168
>> LOCATION:  _bt_swap_posting, nbtdedup.c:1037
>>
>> If I drop the index index_freights_on_cmr_received, then the update succeeds.
>
> What you see here is a defensive "can't happen" error that I added in
> commit 8f72bbac, and backpatched to Postgres 13.4, which came out on
> 2021-08-12. The goal of that error is to make a possible hard crash
> due to corruption into a slightly friendlier kind of failure (the
> error that you see here). Were you running 13.4 before the upgrade?
>
> If you were on 13.3 or earlier before the upgrade to 14, then it's
> possible that the problem was there all along, but is only now visible
> for the first time.
>
> --
> Peter Geoghegan




В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Logical replication - empty search_path bug?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: conchuela timeouts since 2021-10-09 system upgrade