On 03/26/2012 01:06 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 26.03.2012 19:59, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 26.03.2012 19:51, Greg Stark wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Combo CIDs: 755490840 total in 100 blocks; 5161072 free (381
>>>> chunks); 750329768 used
>>>
>>> I think you'll have to catch Heikki's attention to get a good answer
>>> to this.
>>>
>>> Is it possible this job is inserting and then updating (or deleteing)
>>> the row it just inserted and doing a large number of such
>>> insert/update operations all within the same transaction? Or perhaps
>>> it's updating the same row over and over again?
>>
>> .. and all that in different subtransactions.
>
> sorry, scratch that, they don't need to be in different subtransactions.
It's all in a single transaction. In fact the solution I'm currently
testing and seems to be working involves breaking it up into batches of
a few thousand LOs restored per batch.
cheers
andrew