DBD-Pg prepared statement versus plain execution

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rafael Martinez
Тема DBD-Pg prepared statement versus plain execution
Дата
Msg-id 4F69B9B3.7030303@usit.uio.no
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: DBD-Pg prepared statement versus plain execution
Re: DBD-Pg prepared statement versus plain execution
Список pgsql-performance
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello

We are having some performance problems with an application that uses
prepared statement heavily.

We have found out that it creates-executes-destroys a prepared statement
*per* statement it sends to the database (pg-9.1) via DBD-Pg.

A normal log entry for a sql-statement looks e.g. like this:
- ----------------------------------------------------------
[2012-03-15 14:49:12.484 CET]  LOG:  duration: 8.440 ms  parse
dbdpg_p32048_3:

SELECT DISTINCT ACL.RightName FROM ACL, Principals, CachedGroupMembers
WHERE Principals.id = ACL.PrincipalId AND Principals.PrincipalType =
'Group' AND Principals.Disabled = 0 AND CachedGroupMembers.GroupId  =
ACL.PrincipalId AND CachedGroupMembers.GroupId  = Principals.id AND
CachedGroupMembers.MemberId = 19312 AND CachedGroupMembers.Disabled = 0
 AND ((ACL.ObjectType = 'RT::System' AND ACL.ObjectId = 1) OR
(ACL.ObjectType = 'RT::System' AND ACL.ObjectId = 1))

[2012-03-15 14:49:12.485 CET]  LOG:  duration: 0.087 ms  bind
dbdpg_p32048_3:

SELECT DISTINCT ACL.RightName FROM ACL, Principals, CachedGroupMembers
WHERE Principals.id = ACL.PrincipalId AND Principals.PrincipalType =
'Group' AND Principals.Disabled = 0 AND CachedGroupMembers.GroupId  =
ACL.PrincipalId AND CachedGroupMembers.GroupId  = Principals.id AND
CachedGroupMembers.MemberId = 19312 AND CachedGroupMembers.Disabled = 0
 AND ((ACL.ObjectType = 'RT::System' AND ACL.ObjectId = 1) OR
(ACL.ObjectType = 'RT::System' AND ACL.ObjectId = 1))


[2012-03-15 14:49:12.487 CET] LOG:  duration: 1.692 ms  execute
dbdpg_p32048_3:

SELECT DISTINCT ACL.RightName FROM ACL, Principals, CachedGroupMembers
WHERE Principals.id = ACL.PrincipalId AND Principals.PrincipalType =
'Group' AND Principals.Disabled = 0 AND CachedGroupMembers.GroupId  =
ACL.PrincipalId AND CachedGroupMembers.GroupId  = Principals.id AND
CachedGroupMembers.MemberId = 19312 AND CachedGroupMembers.Disabled = 0
 AND ((ACL.ObjectType = 'RT::System' AND ACL.ObjectId = 1) OR
(ACL.ObjectType = 'RT::System' AND ACL.ObjectId = 1))


[2012-03-15 14:49:12.488 CET] LOG:  duration: 0.029 ms  statement:
DEALLOCATE dbdpg_p32048_3
- ----------------------------------------------------------

As you can see, the parse+bind+deallocate part uses much more time than
the execution part. This is the same for many of the statements send to
the database.

My question is:

Is the parse+bind time reported, a time (not reported) that the planer
will use anyway when running a sql-statement in a normal way or the
parse+bind+deallocate time is *extra* time needed by the prepared statement?

Can we assume that running this application without using prepared
statements will do that it runs faster the time used by
parse+bind+deallocate?

Thanks in advance.

regards,
- --
 Rafael Martinez Guerrero
 Center for Information Technology
 University of Oslo, Norway

 PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk9pubAACgkQBhuKQurGihTYkwCcCFYQRDGWD0yaR+f2FFwKs7gN
RfgAoJdPrAzUhfBfsXmst7/l7LVLisHy
=l7Fl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: slow self-join query
Следующее
От: Rafael Martinez
Дата:
Сообщение: timing != log duration