Re: Remembering bug #6123

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: Remembering bug #6123
Дата
Msg-id 4F10517302000025000447C3@gw.wicourts.gov
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remembering bug #6123  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> What do you think of
> 
> ERROR: tuple to be updated was already modified by an operation
> triggered by the UPDATE command
> HINT: Consider using an AFTER trigger instead of a BEFORE trigger
> to propagate changes to other rows.
> 
> (s/update/delete/ for the DELETE case of course)
> 
> The phrase "triggered by" seems slippery enough to cover cases
> such as a volatile function executed by the UPDATE.  The HINT
> doesn't cover that case of course, but we have a ground rule that
> HINTs can be wrong.
Looks good to me.
-Kevin


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remembering bug #6123
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: 9.3 feature proposal: vacuumdb -j #