Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4EFA24F7.6090007@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 25.12.2011 15:01, Kevin Grittner wrote: > I don't believe that. Double-writing is a technique to avoid torn > pages, but it requires a checksum to work. This chicken-and-egg > problem requires the checksum to be implemented first. I don't think double-writes require checksums on the data pages themselves, just on the copies in the double-write buffers. In the double-write buffer, you'll need some extra information per-page anyway, like a relfilenode and block number that indicates which page it is in the buffer. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: