Re: ISN was: Core Extensions relocation

On 11/16/11 7:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heck, we don't even have a field bug report that the design limitation
> is causing any real problems for real users ... so IMO, the claims that
> this is dangerously broken are a bit overblown.

This is why I mentioned clients using ISBN in production.  I have yet to
see any actual breakage in the field.  Granted, both clients are
US-only.   I don't believe either of these clients is depending on the
prefix-check, and that's the sort of thing we could announce in the
release notes.

I do get the feeling that Peter got burned by ISN, given his vehemence
in erasing it from the face of the earth.  So that's one bug report.  ;-)

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com