Re: Simple question on SELECT
| От | Edson Richter | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Simple question on SELECT | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4EB869FC.9010204@simkorp.com.br обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: Simple question on SELECT (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: Simple question on SELECT Re: Simple question on SELECT | 
| Список | pgsql-general | 
Em 07-11-2011 20:54, John R Pierce escreveu: > On 11/07/11 2:41 PM, Edson Richter wrote: >> Does simple SELECT query like >> >> select * from tableX >> >> (without FOR UPDATE) opens an implicit transaction when issued? > > opens and closes. if you don't bracket with BEGIN; .... > COMMIT|ROLLBACK; then each statement is a transaction of and by itself Thanks for the fast answer. Is there any way to avoid that? I mean, in MS SQL Server, I do have "with no_lock" (that produces dirty reads)? Or the way to go is the transaction isolation level? Regards, Edson. > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: