On 10/07/2011 12:51 PM, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 20:36, Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Alex Hunsaker<badalex@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 08:18, Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Amit Khandekar
>>>> <amit.khandekar@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>>> I have no more issues with the patch.
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>> I think this patch needs to be added to the open CommitFest, with
>>>> links to the reviews, and marked Ready for Committer.
>>> The open commitfest? Even if its an "important" bug fix that should be
>>> backpatched?
>> Considering that the issue appears to have been ignored from
>> mid-February until early October, I don't see why it should now get to
>> jump to the head of the queue. Other people may have different
>> opinions, of course.
> Added. :-)
>
I'm just starting to look at this, by way of a break in staring at
pg_dump code ;-). This just needs to be backpatched to 9.1, is that right?
cheers
andrew