Re: out-of-order caution

Simon Riggs  wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Kevin Grittner
>  wrote:
>> On the docs page for the SELECT statement, there is a caution
>> which starts with:
>>
>> | It is possible for a SELECT command using ORDER BY and FOR
>> | UPDATE/SHARE to return rows out of order. This is because ORDER
>> | BY is applied first.
>>
>> Is this risk limited to queries running in READ COMMITTED
>> transactions?  If so, I think that should be mentioned in the
>> caution.
> 
> I think it should say that if this occurs with SERIALIZED
> transactions it will result in a serialisation error.
> 
> Just to say there is no effect in serializable mode wouldn't be
> helpful.
 
OK, doc patch attached.
 
-Kevin