Re: PostGIS in a commercial project
| От | Edoardo Panfili |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostGIS in a commercial project |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4EA5220E.5030807@aspix.it обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostGIS in a commercial project (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostGIS in a commercial project
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Il 24/10/11 10:03, Pavel Stehule ha scritto: > 2011/10/24 Thomas Kellerer<spam_eater@gmx.net>: >> Eduardo Morras, 21.10.2011 20:53: >>>> >>>> Now PostGIS is licensed under the GPL and I wonder if we can use it >>>> in a commercial (customer specific) project then. The source code >>>> will not be made open source, but of course the customer will get >>>> the source code. >>>> >>>> Is it still OK to use the GPL licensed PostGIS in this case? Is >>>> that then considered a derivative work because the application will >>>> not work without PostGIS? >>> >>> If it's pure GPL, then postgresql is automagically relicenced to GPL, >>> because postgresql allows relicencing and GPL force it to be GPL. >>> Your source code must be in GPL too. Remember, it's a virus licence >>> and has the same problem that Midas king had. >> >> Thanks for the answer. >> >> I think we'll better be safe than sorry and we will not use PostGIS then. > > It doesn't mean, so you must to publish your source code on net. Your > codes have to be available to your customers. That is all. You can > distribute your product as service, and then you don't need to show > your codes. > I am developing a web system that uses postgres and postgis, my source code is released under Apache2 licence (The customers has a copy of the whole source reposotory). The server interacts using jdbc and a C function for postgres. The client (java) interacts only with my server application. I think that this is safe, I'm doing wrong? My software has to use the GPL? if I can I'd like to use Apache2 licence for my source code. Regards Edoardo
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: