Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4EA19FCA.30904@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/21/2011 12:05 PM, Florian Pflug wrote: > On Oct21, 2011, at 17:36 , Tom Lane wrote: >> 1. Restrict exported snapshots to be loaded only by transactions running >> in the same database as the exporter. This would fix the problem, but >> it cuts out one of the main use-cases for sync snapshots, namely getting >> cluster-wide-consistent dumps in pg_dumpall. > Isn't the use-case getting consistent *parallel* dumps of a single database > rather than consistent dump of multiple databases? Since we don't have atomic > cross-database commits, what does using the same snapshot to dump multiple > databases buy us? That was my understanding of the use case. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: