Re: exclusive OR possible within a where clause?

On 10/17/11 12:15 PM, David Salisbury wrote:
> <> is the same as !=, which is
> different than the fabled XOR I was hoping for.  In fact
> they would never equal.

F != F -> false
F != T -> true
T != F -> true
T != T -> false


how is that different than XOR, assuming the arguments are booleans ?


--
john r pierce                            N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca                         mid-left coast