Re: 9.1 got really fast ;)
| От | Steve Crawford |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 9.1 got really fast ;) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4E9C48F6.4060809@pinpointresearch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 9.1 got really fast ;) (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 9.1 got really fast ;)
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/16/2011 04:39 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Scott Marlowe<scott.marlowe@gmail.com> writes: >>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Thomas Kellerer<spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote: >>>> Total runtime: -2.368 ms<<==== this is amazing ;) >>> I get something similar when I do select now()-query_start from >>> pg_stat_activity on my Ubuntu 10.04 / pg 8.3 servers. >> Within a transaction block that's not surprising, because now() is >> defined as transaction start time not statement start time. > No transaction block. > Even stand-alone statements take place within a transaction - just not an explicit one. Cheers, Steve
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: