Re: SET variable - Permission issues

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joe Conway
Тема Re: SET variable - Permission issues
Дата
Msg-id 4E949199.8030809@joeconway.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SET variable - Permission issues  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 10/11/2011 11:53 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> Is this a TODO?  We might not want to make work_mem SUSET, but it 
>> would allow administrators to control this.
> 
> Well, we've identified a few people who like the idea, but I'm not 
> sure we have the degree of consensus we normally look for before 
> putting something on the TODO list.

That's pretty much what I was thinking.

> After the discussion on this thread, are there still any *objections*
> to allowing bounds or subsets to be SUSET to limit GUC values more
> strictly than the limits hard-coded in C?

No objections here.

Joe

-- 
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Index only scan paving the way for "auto" clustered tables?
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Index only scan paving the way for "auto" clustered tables?