Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4E89FCB6.4060609@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only
directories
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/03/2011 02:15 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> On 10/03/2011 12:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I was never exactly thrilled with the separate-config-directory design >>> to start with, so I'm probably not the person to opine on whether we >>> could get away with removing it. >>> >>> >> The horse has well and truly bolted. We'd have a major row if anyone >> tried to remove it. Let's not rehash old battles. Our only option is to >> make it work as best we can. > I disagree. If people were using it we would have had many more bug > reports about pg_ctl not working. > No, that's an indication people aren't using pg_ctl, not that they aren't using separate config dirs. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: