Re: Double sorting split patch

On 17.09.2011 17:36, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Heikki Linnakangas<
> heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>  wrote:
>
>> That looks awfully complicated. I don't understand how that works. I wonder
>> if two passes would be simpler?
>>
> I doubt it becomes much simpler, but here it is.

Thanks! It does look a lot simpler that way, IMHO. I presume this didn't 
change the performance characteristics?

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com