Re: [HACKERS] Statement-level rollback
От | Ideriha, Takeshi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Statement-level rollback |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E72940DA2BF16479384A86D54D0988A565F5468@G01JPEXMBKW04 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Statement-level rollback (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, This feature hasn't been updated for a long time, but I've just been interested in this feature and looking into the mailing list. From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us] > In short, you can't make fundamental changes in transactional behavior without > enormous breakage. That was the lesson we learned from the autocommit fiasco > and I do not believe that it's inapplicable here. I've just wanted to confirm what "autocommit fiasco" points out. Are the below threads and git-log relevant discussion? (If there are any other threads, could you please tell me the link?) https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3E54526A.121EBEE5%40tpf.co.jp#3E54526A.121EBEE5@tpf.co.jp https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=f85f43dfb5b9043ea6b01d8b824c195cd7f9ed3c Regards, Takeshi Ideriha
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: