On 12/09/2011 12:12, I wrote:
> On 2011-09-10 19:50, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
>> I tried this patch and noticed something weird. This is probably not
>> intentional:
>
> Indeed, it is not intentional. Will see how I can fix this.
The attached patch is the best I could come up with. I considered
showing "Rows Removed by Foo: (never executed)" and omitting the line
altogether, but I didn't particularly like either of those options. The
current patch simply displays "Rows Removed by Foo: 0".
I also added a comment the last patch was missing.
--
Marko Tiikkaja http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services