Re: Transforming IN (...) to ORs, volatility

On 06.09.2011 20:53, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian<bruce@momjian.us>  writes:
>>> Uh, have we addressed this?  I don't think so.
>>
>> No.  IIRC, I didn't like Heikki's proposed patch, so it's on my head
>> to come up with something better.
>
> You can blame me for getting it into the parser.  It used to be in
> gram.y!

Huh? Isn't "the parser" and "gram.y" more or less the same thing? 
Anyway, it needs to be somewhere else..

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com