Re: [ADMIN] Using Postgresql as application server
| От | sad@bestmx.ru |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [ADMIN] Using Postgresql as application server |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4E4AA0FF.6000206@bestmx.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [ADMIN] Using Postgresql as application server (Evan Rempel <erempel@uvic.ca>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Evan Rempel пишет: > Security is near impossible to manage as well. Again, almost > everything needs to run as > the same user. throw your nameless DMS away, or fire the architect. >>> Scott Marlowe ÐÉÛÅÔ: >>>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:33 AM, sad@bestmx.ru<sad@bestmx.ru> šwrote: >>>>> Scott Marlowe ÐÉÛÅÔ: >>>>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:57 AM, c k<shreeseva.learning@gmail.com> >>>>>> šwrote: >>>>>>> Dear Postgres users, >>>>>>> from last few months I am reading and searching for can >>>>>>> postgresql used >>>>>>> as >>>>>>> application server? As postgresql supports many languages like >>>>>>> pl/perl, >>>>>> Besides the previously mentioned nginx module there's apache's mod >>>>>> libpq http://asmith.id.au/mod_libpq.html >>>>>> >>>>>> But I'd stick to a language to wrap stuff in like php etc. >>>>> BTW, string concatenation in postgresql (plpgsql) is FASTER than >>>>> in PHP >>>> But I can throw 1,000 cores at a large load with php. šMuch harder to >>>> do with plpgsql. >>> and? >>> all of them would inevitably connect the same postgresql >> >> And they'd each need postgresql to do a concat? I'd hope nobody was >> dumb enough to program the app layer to do something like that. PG >> might make a decent app server, but there's no way you could scale it >> to millions of users like you could a farm of app servers. >> > 2011/8/16 sad@bestmx.ru <sad@bestmx.ru>: > > -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: