On 08/16/2011 04:56 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 23:49, Greg Stark<stark@mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> ... and that would be a seriously bad API. There are not SUSET
>>> restrictions on other resources such as work_mem. Why do we need
>>> one for this?
>> I think a better analogy would be imposing a maximum number of rows a
>> query can output. That might be a sane thing to have for some
>> circumstances but it's not useful in general.
> Uh. You mean like LIMIT, which we already have?
There is no LIMIT imposed on a query by a server setting, which would be
the right analogy here.
cheers
andrew