Claire Chang <yenhsiac@yahoo.com> wrote:
> hi, We recently bought a 4 8core 128G memory database server and I
> am setting it up to replace our old 4 4cores 128G memory database
> server as a master. The memory related settings that we use on
> the old machine seem a bit wrong according to the experts on IRC:
> max_connections = 600
You're probably going to get better performance by setting that to 2
to 3 times the number of actual cores (don't county hyperthreading
for this purpose), and using a connection pooler to funnel the 600
user connections down to a smaller number of database connections.
> shared_buffers = 32GB
I seem to remember seeing some benchmarks showing that performance
falls off after 10GB or 20GB on that setting.
> effective_cache_size = 64GB
Seems sane.
> work_mem = 5MB
You could bump that up, especially if you go to the connection pool.
> maintenance_work_mem = 1GB
OK, but I might double that.
> wal_buffers = 64kB
This should definitely be set to 16MB.
-Kevin