Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings

On 03.08.2011 12:25, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Attached patch removes the tautologolical part of an evaluated
> expression, fixing the problem flagged by this quite valid warning.

The check is only tautological if the compiler implements enums as 
unsigned integers. Whether enums are signed or not is 
implementation-dependent. Perhaps cast status to unsigned or signed 
explicitly before the checks?

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com