Re: python cleanup

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: python cleanup
Дата
Msg-id 4E2D7B22.8040906@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: python cleanup  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: python cleanup
Re: python cleanup
Список pgsql-hackers

On 07/24/2011 11:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

[python headers set _POSIX_C_SOURCE and _XOPEN_SOURCE]
> What in the world are the python headers doing fooling with these
> macros, anyway??
>
Good question.    It seems unfriendly. It looks like you're just about guaranteed to get a warning if you include any
systemheader before you include Python.h.
 

So either we have to dance around that or we have to give up the idea that postgres.h must come first. It wouldn't be
thefirst time we've had to do that sort of dance.
 

The reason we get warnings about these and not about many other things it defines (such as the HAVE_foo macros) is that
theseare set to values different from those encountered in the previously included headers.
 

cheers

andrew







В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Questions and experiences writing a Foreign Data Wrapper
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: python cleanup