Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors

Tom,

> No, I don't.  You're adding complication to solve a problem that doesn't
> need to be solved.  The standard says to return the name of the
> constraint for a constraint-violation failure.  It does not say anything
> about naming the associated column(s).  COLUMN_NAME is only supposed to
> be defined for certain kinds of errors, and this isn't one of them.

Are we talking about FK constraints here, or CHECK contstraints?

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com