On 14.07.2011 22:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> Why is the posting tree a tree? AFAICS, we never search it using the
>> TID, it's always scanned in whole. It would be simpler to store the TIDs
>> in a posting list in no particular order. This could potentially make
>> insertions cheaper, as you could just append to the last posting list
>> page for the key, instead of traversing the posting tree to a particular
>> location. You could also pack the tids denser, as you wouldn't need to
>> reserve free space for additions in the middle.
>
> Surely VACUUM would like to search it by TID for deletion purposes?
It doesn't, it scans all the tid lists in whole. I guess it could search
by TID, it could be a win if there's only a few deleted tuples, in a
small range of pages.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com