Re: Small patch for GiST: move childoffnum to child

On 10.07.2011 21:43, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Teodor, Oleg, Heikki,
>
>> My concern is that I am unable to prove to myself simply by reading
>> the code that the 24 line chunk deleted from gistFindPath (near ***
>> 919,947 ****) are no longer needed.  My familiarity with the gist code
>> is low enough that it is not surprising that I cannot prove this to
>> myself from first principles.  I have no reason to believe it is not
>> correct, it is just that I can't convince myself that it is correct.
>
> Can one of you weigh in on Jeff's concern here about this patch?

As it happens, I'm just looking at it. I believe there's a small bug in 
the patch, I'm just testing it to verify. Stay tuned!

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com