Re: Select For Update and Left Outer Join

On 11.07.2011 18:44, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> (In our in-house
> testing I've so far found one place where we needed to take an
> explicit lock on a dummy table we created just to control access to
> a sequence -- sequences don't follow normal transactional
> semantics.)

Hmm, is that something we should do something about? Can you give an 
example of that?

Not in 9.1, except in the docs if we don't mention that already, but in 
the future...

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com