Re: SSI atomic commit

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: SSI atomic commit
Дата
Msg-id 4E162628.6080100@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SSI atomic commit  (Dan Ports <drkp@csail.mit.edu>)
Ответы Re: SSI atomic commit
Список pgsql-hackers
On 08.07.2011 00:21, Dan Ports wrote:
> We should also apply the attached patch, which corrects a minor issue
> with the conditions for flagging transactions that could potentially
> make a snapshot unsafe.
>
> There's a small window wherein a transaction is committed but not yet
> on the finished list, and we shouldn't flag it as a potential conflict
> if so. We can also skip adding a doomed transaction to the list of
> possible conflicts because we know it won't commit.

Hmm, it's now also possible for the transaction to be prepared, and 
already visible to others, but not yet flagged as committed. Shouldn't 
those be included too?

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Cédric Villemain
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: patch review : Add ability to constrain backend temporary file space
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints