Alban Hertroys wrote:
> On 3 Jul 2011, at 12:00, Geoffrey Myers wrote:
>
>> We have a process that we successfully ran on virtually identical
>> databases. The process completed fine on a machine with 8 gig of
>> memory. The process fails when run on another machine that has 16
>> gig of memory with the following error:
>>
>> out of memory for query result
>
> You didn't mention what client you're using, but could it possibly be
> the client that's running out of memory? The fact that it's happening
> in the query result seems to point to the client.
Perl.
> Another thing you might want to check: Does the second server have at
> least as much shared memory configured in the kernel as the first
> has?
I was thinking that might be the issue. They have the same amount of
share memory configured, but the server that had the error, has 8
postmasters running, whereas the other server only has one.
>
> Alban Hertroys
>
> -- Screwing up is an excellent way to attach something to the
> ceiling.
>
>
> !DSPAM:1272,4e109ddd12091486111017!
>
>
>
--
Until later, Geoffrey
"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson