Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4DE8D6CC.5090109@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/25/2011 03:07 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2011-04-27 at 18:14 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
>> Enthusiastic +1 for this concept. There's at least one rough edge: it fails if
>> you have another postmaster running on port 5432.
> This has now been addressed: pg_upgrade accepts PGPORT settings.
> Attached is a slightly updated patch runs the test suite with a port of
> 65432, which you can override by setting PGPORT yourself.
>
> Anyway, is this something that people want in the repository? It's not
> as polished as the pg_regress business, but it is definitely helpful.
As is, this will probably break on a bunch of platforms. I suspect you
will need the equivalent of this snippet from pg_regress.c:
add_to_path("LD_LIBRARY_PATH", ':', libdir); add_to_path("DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH", ':', libdir);
add_to_path("LIBPATH", ':', libdir); #if defined(WIN32) add_to_path("PATH", ';', libdir); #elif
defined(__CYGWIN__) add_to_path("PATH", ':', libdir); #endif
For extra credit, you could create a subroutine in vcregress.pl to run
the check for MSVC builds.
cheers
andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: