Re: time-delayed standbys
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: time-delayed standbys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DCA5BEC.2020805@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: time-delayed standbys (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: time-delayed standbys
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11.05.2011 08:29, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> I was able to reproduce something very like this in unpatched master, >> just by letting recovery pause at a named restore point, and then >> resuming it. > > I was able to reproduce the same problem even in 9.0. When the standby > reaches the recovery target, it always tries to end the recovery even > though walreceiver is still running, which causes the problem. This seems > to be an oversight in streaming replication. I should have considered how > the standby should work when recovery_target is specified. > > What about the attached patch? Which stops walreceiver instead of > emitting PANIC there only if we've reached the recovery target. I think we can just always call ShutdownWalRcv(). It should be gone if the server was promoted while streaming, but that's just an implementation detail of what the promotion code does. There's no hard reason why it shouldn't be running at that point anymore, as long as we kill it before going any further. Committed a patch to do that. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: