Re: Time to put theory to the test?
| От | Mark Kirkwood |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Time to put theory to the test? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4DB6669B.3090508@catalyst.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Time to put theory to the test? (Rob Wultsch <wultsch@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On 26/04/11 15:04, Rob Wultsch wrote:
Or even switch to the Mariadb fork and use the crash safe Aria engine [1] instead of Myisam if you must be without transactions. That has the additional benefit of getting out from under the "Big O" - which is always nice!
Cheers
Mark
[1] I have not personally tested that Aria is crash safe, but can attest that Innodb certainly is.
+1On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:30 PM, J Sisson <sisson.j@gmail.com> wrote:machines, and virtually every MySQL machine has required data cleanup and table scans and tweaks to get it back to "production" status.Tip from someone that manages thousands of MySQL servers: Use InnoDB when using MySQL. Using a crash unsafe product will yield undesirable results when a server crashes. It is also faster for many use cases. InnoDB is crash safe. It is just that simple.
Or even switch to the Mariadb fork and use the crash safe Aria engine [1] instead of Myisam if you must be without transactions. That has the additional benefit of getting out from under the "Big O" - which is always nice!
Cheers
Mark
[1] I have not personally tested that Aria is crash safe, but can attest that Innodb certainly is.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: