Re: Unnessecary use of new Integer(n) in AbstractJdbc2ResultSet

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:

> I just downloaded the "postgresql-9.1dev-900" jars, and I find
> that the -jdbc3 jar has a bytecode version compatible with a JDK
> 1.0 and 1.1 JVMs, even though we reference classes and methods
> which aren't available until later JVMs.

I just double-checked, and found that I'd messed up my initial check
on that.  The right target level is used for each.  Sorry for the
noise.

-Kevin