Re: Re: database system identifier differs between the primary and standby

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: Re: database system identifier differs between the primary and standby
Дата
Msg-id 4DB162DE020000250003CBD4@gw.wicourts.gov
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: database system identifier differs between the primary and standby  ("Deka, Rajib IN MAA SL" <rajib.deka@siemens.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Deka, Rajib IN MAA SL" <rajib.deka@siemens.com> wrote:
> Finally I setup two machines for primary and backup using the
> following link.
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Streaming_Replication
> 
> But after starting the backup I got the following messages and
> postgresql service doesn't start.
> 2011-04-22 14:37:54 ETC/GMT DEBUG:  executing restore command "cp 
> /opt/PostgreSQL/9.0/data/archive/000000010000000000000007 
> "pg_xlog/RECOVERYXLOG""
> 2011-04-22 14:37:54 ETC/GMT LOG:  restored log file
> "000000010000000000000007" 
> from archive
> 2011-04-22 14:37:54 ETC/GMT DEBUG:  got WAL segment from archive
> 2011-04-22 14:37:54 ETC/GMT LOG:  record with zero length at
> 0/700011C
> 2011-04-22 14:37:54 ETC/GMT LOG:  record with zero length at
> 0/700011C
You will probably get better results starting a new thread on
pgsql-general with details about how you have this set up, in
addition to log entries such as you have shown.  The pgsql-hackers
list is really not the right place to discuss this, and many people
selectively read messages based on the subject line, so a misleading
subject line may prevent the people best placed to help you from
reading the post.
-Kevin


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: "stored procedures"
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: best way to test new index?