On 20.04.2011 18:08, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> "Marko Tiikkaja"<marko.tiikkaja@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
>> TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(((bool) (((void*)(&(newTuple->t_self)) !=
>> ((void *)0))&& ((&(newTuple->t_self))->ip_posid != 0))))", File:
>> "predicate.c", Line: 2282)
>
> Am investigating, and have alerted Dan, in case he hasn't noticed
> this thread.
The immediate fix is trivial:
--- a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c
@@ -2859,7 +2859,7 @@ l2:
* Any existing SIREAD locks on the old tuple must be linked to
the new
* tuple for conflict detection purposes.
*/
- PredicateLockTupleRowVersionLink(relation, &oldtup, newtup);
+ PredicateLockTupleRowVersionLink(relation, &oldtup, heaptup);
if (newbuf != buffer)
LockBuffer(newbuf, BUFFER_LOCK_UNLOCK);
But the question Tom raised about doing this even for non-serializable
transactions is more serious..
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com