> Perhaps we can outline Major Features and Innovations separately. This
> release is notable for the number of genuinely new ideas implemented,
> so that's worth making something of even if the advanced features
> themselves need a little more explanation. Or Perhaps have
> "Innovations" as a major feature and then a comma list of the names of
> them.
Yeah, that sounds like the way to go.
So for Innovations, we'd have SSI, SE/Postgres, KNN-GiST, and wCTE, no?
Or does someone else have wCTEs? I vaguely remember something about
SQL Server ...
There's also another obvious grouping: Extensibility. This would
include both Extensions and SQL/MED.
So we could have:
Features
Sync Rep
Per-col collation
Unlogged tables
Innovations
SSI
KNN-GiST
SE/Postgres
wCTE
Extensibility
Extensions
SQL/MED
I like that, it means we can list everything but without having a long
laundry list which nobody will read.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com