Re: CMS, foreign keys, and the legacy of MySQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: CMS, foreign keys, and the legacy of MySQL
Дата
Msg-id 4D825A1B.6010805@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на CMS, foreign keys, and the legacy of MySQL  (jj ff <m9mq@live.com>)
Ответы Re: CMS, foreign keys, and the legacy of MySQL  (Rob Wultsch <wultsch@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
On 3/17/11 11:52 AM, jj ff wrote:
> Here's a comment I found while googling around on these issues:  "The
> problem isn't that InnoDB itself is slow, it's that enforcing foreign
> key relations is slow. I'm a big fan of referential integrity, but in a
> CMS it's place is in the application layer, not the data layer."  Why
> would anyone say that?  What's the point of using a DB if you're not
> doing to put FKs in it?

Well, they're right ... for InnoDB.  If you're only experience with a
relational database is MySQL, then you're liable to think that FKs are a
disaster.

--
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com

В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: jj ff
Дата:
Сообщение: CMS, foreign keys, and the legacy of MySQL
Следующее
От: damien clochard
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal for a PostgreSQL Print Magazine