Re: Help with Query Tuning
От
Reid Thompson
Тема
Re: Help with Query Tuning
Дата
Msg-id
4D80F24E.1090807@ateb.com
Ответ на
Help with Query Tuning (Adarsh Sharma)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Help with Query Tuning Adarsh Sharma <adarsh.sharma@orkash.com>
Re: Help with Query Tuning Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>
Re: Help with Query Tuning Adarsh Sharma <adarsh.sharma@orkash.com>
Re: Help with Query Tuning Adarsh Sharma <adarsh.sharma@orkash.com>
Re: Help with Query Tuning tv@fuzzy.cz
Re: Help with Query Tuning Reid Thompson <Reid.Thompson@ateb.com>
On 03/16/2011 05:13 AM, Adarsh Sharma wrote: > Dear all, > > I am facing a problem while creating the index to make the below query run faster. My table size is near about 1065 MB and 428467 rows. > > explain analyze select count(*) from page_content where publishing_date like '%2010%' and content_language='en' and content is not > null and isprocessable = 1 and (content like '%Militant%' > OR content like '%jihad%' OR content like '%Mujahid%' OR > content like '%fedayeen%' OR content like '%insurgent%' OR content like '%terrorist%' OR > content like '%cadre%' OR content like '%civilians%' OR content like '%police%' OR content like '%defence%' OR content like '%cops%' > OR content like '%crpf%' OR content like '%dsf%' OR content like '%ssb%') AND (content like '%kill%' or content like '%injure%'); > > *Output: > > * Aggregate (cost=107557.78..107557.79 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=18564.631..18564.631 rows=1 loops=1) > -> Seq Scan on page_content (cost=0.00..107466.82 rows=36381 width=0) (actual time=0.146..18529.371 rows=59918 loops=1) > Filter: ((content IS NOT NULL) AND (publishing_date ~~ '%2010%'::text) AND (content_language = 'en'::bpchar) AND (isprocessable = 1) > AND (((content) > ::text ~~ '%kill%'::text) OR ((content)::text ~~ '%injure%'::text)) AND (((content)::text ~~ '%Militant%'::text) OR ((content)::text > ~~ '%jihad%'::text) OR ( > (content)::text ~~ '%Mujahid%'::text) OR ((content)::text ~~ '%fedayeen%'::text) OR ((content)::text ~~ '%insurgent%'::text) OR > ((content)::text ~~ '%terrori > st%'::text) OR ((content)::text ~~ '%cadre%'::text) OR ((content)::text ~~ '%civilians%'::text) OR ((content)::text ~~ > '%police%'::text) OR ((content)::text > ~~ '%defence%'::text) OR ((content)::text ~~ '%cops%'::text) OR ((content)::text ~~ '%crpf%'::text) OR ((content)::text ~~ > '%dsf%'::text) OR ((content)::text > ~~ '%ssb%'::text))) > Total runtime: 18564.673 ms > You should read the documentation regarding indices and pattern matching as well as fts. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/indexes-types.html The optimizer can also use a B-tree index for queries involving the pattern matching operators LIKE and ~ if the pattern is a constant and is anchored to the beginning of the string — for example, col LIKE 'foo%' or col ~ '^foo', but not col LIKE '%bar'. However, if your server does not use the C locale you will need to create the index with a special operator class to support indexing of pattern-matching queries. See Section 11.9 below. It is also possible to use B-tree indexes for ILIKE and ~*, but only if the pattern starts with non-alphabetic characters, i.e. characters that are not affected by upper/lower case conversion. I believe that your query as written using '%pattern%' will always be forced to use sequential scans.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Shaun Thomas
Дата: