Re: Better estimates of index correlation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: Better estimates of index correlation
Дата
Msg-id 4D7EB271.70906@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Better estimates of index correlation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Better estimates of index correlation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Better estimates of index correlation  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>> As Heikki says, maybe this wouldn't be an issue at all if we can do it
>> during ANALYZE instead, but I don't know if that works.
> 
> I'm not convinced you can get a sufficiently good estimate from a small
> subset of pages.

Note that if this requires VACUUM rather than ANALYZE, it introduces a
problem for data warehousing users, who can go years between vacuums of
their largest tables.

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: really lazy vacuums?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Better estimates of index correlation