Re: Using bytea field...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Sim Zacks
Тема Re: Using bytea field...
Дата
Msg-id 4D776414.5070403@compulab.co.il
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Using bytea field...  (Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>)
Ответы Re: Using bytea field...
Re: Using bytea field...
Re: Using bytea field...
Список pgsql-general
MD5 is not collision resistant (using the immortal words of wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD5).

This means that it is possible that multiple images will return the same
md5 hash.

The question is, if it screws up and says that an image already exists
and then returns a different image when querying for it, how bad would
that be.


I've seen a lot of discussions in the past few years about how
problematic the md5 approach is.


Sim


On 03/08/2011 09:06 PM, Andy Colson wrote:

> On 3/8/2011 12:28 PM, Andre Lopes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using a bytea field to store small images in base64. I need to
>> know if I can compare bytea rows for equality. To know for example if
>> the file already exists in the database, this is possible with bytea?
>>
>> Best Regads,
>>
>
> You dont need to use both base64 and bytea.  You can store base64 in
> text field... or just store the photo as-is into bytea.
>
> To answer your question: it would be faster if you computed an md5 (or
> sha or whatever) and stored it in the db, then you could check to see
> if an image exists by searching for the md5, which would be way
> faster, an send a lot less data over the wire.
>
> -Andy
>


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Graham
Дата:
Сообщение: Transaction wraparound vacuum synchronicity
Следующее
От: Sim Zacks
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Using bytea field...