Re: equivalent of mysql's SET type?
| От | Darren Duncan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: equivalent of mysql's SET type? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4D76DD61.7040707@darrenduncan.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | equivalent of mysql's SET type? (Reece Hart <reece@harts.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: equivalent of mysql's SET type?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Reece Hart wrote:
> I'm considering porting a MySQL database to PostgreSQL. That database uses
> MySQL's SET type. Does anyone have advice about representing this type in
> PostgreSQL?
>
> MySQL DDL excerpt:
> CREATE TABLE `transcript_variation` (
> `transcript_variation_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
> `transcript_stable_id` varchar(128) NOT NULL,
> ...
> `consequence_type`
> set('ESSENTIAL_SPLICE_SITE','STOP_GAINED','STOP_LOST','COMPLEX_INDEL','SPLICE_SITE')
> ) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=174923212 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
>
> I'm considering implementing this as a new type based on a bit vector, but I
> wonder if anyone has a more flexible general solution.
Try starting with an enum type to define the possible values:
CREATE TYPE Consequence_Type
AS ENUM ('ESSENTIAL_SPLICE_SITE','STOP_GAINED',
'STOP_LOST','COMPLEX_INDEL','SPLICE_SITE');
... and then you could try using "ARRAY OF Consequence_Type" or some such.
-- Darren Duncan
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: