Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4D7273B0.9010402@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/05/2011 12:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Dimitri Fontaine<dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes: >> Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >>> The only easy fix I can see at the moment is to arbitrarily create two >>> pg_proc entries --- they can both point at the same C function, but >>> there need to be two of 'em. >> So for 9.1, I think you took the simplest path available. > It's never that easy :-(. I've been trying to figure out why frogmouth > (Windows/cygwin buildfarm member) suddenly started failing: > It's mingw, not cygwin (brolga is the cygwin animal, and it doesn't build with python.) But good catch on the problem. FYI, I'm working on the MSVC issues. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: