On 2011-02-28 8:20 AM +0200, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja<marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> writes:
>> On 2011-02-24 6:40 PM, I wrote:
>>> I am planning on working on the documentation this weekend.
>
>> And here's my attempt. The language is a bit poor at some places but I
>> can't think of anything better.
>
> Applied after some rather heavy editorialization.
Thanks again.
>> I tried to be more strict about using "subquery" when talking about
>> WITHs in general since INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE is not a subquery in my book.
>
> I undid most of those changes --- it didn't seem to add anything to be
> strict in this way, and anyway you hadn't done it consistently,
> eg the syntax still had "with_query".
I wasn't so sure about those changes either. It does seem more
consistent this way.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja