Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature
| От | Marko Tiikkaja |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4D6B753C.1010502@cs.helsinki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2011-02-28 8:20 AM +0200, Tom Lane wrote: > Marko Tiikkaja<marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> writes: >> On 2011-02-24 6:40 PM, I wrote: >>> I am planning on working on the documentation this weekend. > >> And here's my attempt. The language is a bit poor at some places but I >> can't think of anything better. > > Applied after some rather heavy editorialization. Thanks again. >> I tried to be more strict about using "subquery" when talking about >> WITHs in general since INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE is not a subquery in my book. > > I undid most of those changes --- it didn't seem to add anything to be > strict in this way, and anyway you hadn't done it consistently, > eg the syntax still had "with_query". I wasn't so sure about those changes either. It does seem more consistent this way. Regards, Marko Tiikkaja
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: