Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Дата
Msg-id 4D683E15.4090409@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> 4. Even if we could accurately estimate the percentage of the table
> that is cached, what then?  For example, suppose that a user issues a
> query which retrieves 1% of a table, and we know that 1% of that table
> is cached.  How much of the data that the user asked for is cache?

FWIW, for a manual override setting, I was thinking that the % would
convert to a probability.  In that way, it wouldn't be different from
the existing RPC calculation; we're just estimating how *likely* it is
that the data the user wants is cached.

> One idea Tom and I kicked around previously is to set an assumed
> caching percentage for each table based on its size relative to
> effective_cache_size - in other words, assume that the smaller a table
> is, the more of it will be cached.  Consider a system with 8GB of RAM,
> and a table which is 64kB.  It is probably unwise to make any plan
> based on the assumption that that table is less than fully cached.  If
> it isn't before the query executes, it soon will be.  Going to any
> amount of work elsewhere in the plan to avoid the work of reading that
> table in from disk is probably a dumb idea.  Of course, one downside
> of this approach is that it doesn't know which tables are hot and
> which tables are cold, but it would probably still be an improvement
> over the status quo.

Actually, we *do* have some idea which tables are hot.  Or at least, we
could.   Currently, pg_stats for tables are "timeless"; they just
accumulate from the last reset, which has always been a problem in
general for monitoring.  If we could make top-level table and index
stats time-based, even in some crude way, we would know which tables
were currently hot.  That would also have the benefit of making server
performance analysis and autotuning easier.

> But DBAs
> frequently have a very good idea of which stuff is in cache - they can
> make observations over a period of time and then adjust settings and
> then observe some more and adjust some more.

Agreed.

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Cédric Villemain
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: disposition of remaining patches