On 16.02.2011 19:29, Robert Haas wrote:
> Actually, on further reflection, I'm not even sure why we bother with
> the fsync. It seems like a useful safeguard but I'm not seeing how we
> can get to that point without having fsync'd everything anyway. Am I
> missing something?
WalRcvDie() is called on error. For example, if the connection dies
unexpectedly during walrcv_receive().
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com