Re: review: FDW API

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: review: FDW API
Дата
Msg-id 4D5AE410.80301@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: review: FDW API  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 15.02.2011 21:00, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>  wrote:
>> I'm actually surprised we don't need to distinguish them in more places, but
>> nevertheless it feels like we should have that info available more
>> conveniently, and without requiring a catalog lookup like get_rel_relkind()
>> does. At first I thought we should add a field to RelOptInfo, but that
>> doesn't help transformLockingClause. Adding the field to RangeTblEntry seems
>> quite invasive, and it doesn't feel like the right place to cache that kind
>> of information anyway. Thoughts on that?
>
> Maybe it should be a new RTEKind.

That would be even more invasive.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: review: FDW API
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: review: FDW API