Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again...
Дата
Msg-id 4D53CA4F020000250003A789@gw.wicourts.gov
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again...  (Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>)
Ответы Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again...  (Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>)
Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again...  (Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>)
Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again...  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-performance
Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com> wrote:

> how difficult would it be to add that syntax to the JOIN
> statement, for example?

Something like this syntax?:

JOIN WITH (correlation_factor=0.3)

Where 1.0 might mean that for each value on the left there was only
one distinct value on the right, and 0.0 would mean that they were
entirely independent?  (Just as an off-the-cuff example -- I'm not
at all sure that this makes sense, let alone is the best thing to
specify.  I'm trying to get at *syntax* here, not particular knobs.)

-Kevin

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again...
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again...