Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vitalii Tymchyshyn
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Дата
Msg-id 4D4A7B69.2020704@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (david@lang.hm)
Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
02.02.11 20:32, Robert Haas написав(ла):
>
> Yeah.  Any kind of bulk load into an empty table can be a problem,
> even if it's not temporary.  When you load a bunch of data and then
> immediately plan a query against it, autoanalyze hasn't had a chance
> to do its thing yet, so sometimes you get a lousy plan.

May be introducing something like 'AutoAnalyze' threshold will help? I
mean that any insert/update/delete statement that changes more then x%
of table (and no less then y records) must do analyze right after it was
finished.
Defaults like x=50 y=10000 should be quite good as for me.

Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Which RAID Controllers to pick/avoid?
Следующее
От: Glyn Astill
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Which RAID Controllers to pick/avoid?