Re: Large object corruption during 'piped' pg_restore
| От | Bosco Rama |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Large object corruption during 'piped' pg_restore |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4D39C5F5.1090609@boscorama.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Large object corruption during 'piped' pg_restore (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Large object corruption during 'piped' pg_restore
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote: > > So I'm not sure whether to fix it, or leave it as a known failure case > in old branches. Comments? I understand the reluctance to fool with stable code. I have zero insight into your installed versions distribution and backward compatibility needs so any comment I may have here is purely selfish. As an end user there is one area of the DB that I want to work correctly 100% of the time and that is the dump/restore tool(s). If it's not going to work under certain circumstances it should at least tell me so and fail. I don't think having the tool appear to work while corrupting the data (even if documented as doing so) is a viable method of operation. Just my $0.02 Bosco.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: